Optical detection apparatus and methods

ABSTRACT

An optical object detection apparatus and associated methods. The apparatus may comprise a lens (e.g., fixed-focal length wide aperture lens) and an image sensor. The fixed focal length of the lens may correspond to a depth of field area in front of the lens. When an object enters the depth of field area (e.g., sue to a relative motion between the object and the lens) the object representation on the image sensor plane may be in-focus. Objects outside the depth of field area may be out of focus. In-focus representations of objects may be characterized by a greater contrast parameter compared to out of focus representations. One or more images provided by the detection apparatus may be analyzed in order to determine useful information (e.g., an image contrast parameter) of a given image. Based on the image contrast meeting one or more criteria, a detection indication may be produced.

Copyright

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Disclosure

The present disclosure relates to, inter alia, computerized apparatus and methods for detecting objects or targets using processing of optical data.

2. Description of Related Art

Object detection may be required for target approach/obstacle avoidance by autonomous robotic devices. Small sized and/or low-cost robotic vehicles may comprise limited processing and/or energy resources (and/or weight budget) for object detection.

A variety of object detection apparatus (such as IR-based, ultrasonic, and lidar) currently exist, but suffer from various disabilities. Specifically, some existing infrared (IR) optical proximity sensing methods may prove unreliable, particularly when used outdoors and/or in presence of other sources of infrared radiation. Ultrasonic proximity sensors may become unreliable outdoors, particularly on e.g., unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) comprising multiple motors that may produce acoustic noise. The ultrasonic sensor distance output may also be affected by wind and/or humidity. Lidar based systems are typically costly, heavy, and may require substantial computing resources for processing lidar data.

Therefore there exists a need for an improved object detection sensor apparatus, and associated methods. Specifically, in one application, the improved detection sensor apparatus would be one or more of small sized, inexpensive, reliable, lightweight, power efficient, and/or capable of effective use outdoors.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure satisfies the foregoing need for an improved object detection apparatus and associated methods.

Specifically, one aspect of the disclosure relates to a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions embodied thereon, the instructions being executable to perform a method of detecting a distance to an object.

Another aspect of the disclosure relates to a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions embodied thereon, the instructions being executable on a processing apparatus to detect an object in an image. In one implementation, the detection includes: producing a high-pass filtered version of the image, the high-pass filtered version comprising a plurality of pixels; for at least some of the plurality of pixels, determining a deviation parameter between the value of a given pixel and a reference value; and based on the deviation parameter meeting a criterion, providing an indication of the object being present in the image.

In one variant, the high-pass filtered version of the image is configured produced based at least on a first convolution operation between a kernel and the image, the kernel characterized by a kernel dimension; and the convolution operation is configured to reduce energy associated spatial scales in the image that are lower than the kernel dimension. The kernel is configured for example based at least on a second convolution operation of a first matrix, the first matrix configured based at least on a Laplacian operator, and a second matrix configured based at least on a Gaussian operator; and the image is characterized by image dimension, the image dimension exceeding the kernel dimension by at least 10ten times (10×).

In another variant, the criterion comprises meeting or exceeding a prescribed threshold.

In another aspect of the disclosure, an optical object detection apparatus is disclosed. In one implementation, the apparatus includes: a lens characterized by a depth of field range; an image sensor configured to provide an image comprising one or more pixels; and logic in communication with the image sensor. The logic is configured to in one variant: evaluate at least a portion of the image to determine an image contrast parameter; and produce an object detection indication based on the contrast parameter breaching a threshold meeting one or more criteria, the object indication configured to convey presence of the object within the depth of field range.

In another variant, the image sensor comprises an array of photo-sensitive elements arranged in a plane disposed substantially parallel to the lens; and the image comprises an array of pixels, individual pixels being produced by individual ones of the photo-sensitive elements.

In another aspect, a method of navigating a trajectory by a robotic apparatus is disclosed. In one implementation, the apparatus includes a controller, an actuator and a sensor, and the method includes: obtaining at least one image associated with surroundings of the apparatus using the sensor; analyzing the at least one image to determine a contrast parameter of the image; detecting a presence of an object in the at least one image based at least in part on based on the contrast parameter meeting one or more criteria; and causing the controller to activate the actuator based on the detection of the presence of the object. In one variant, the actuator activation is configured consistent with a characteristic of the object.

In another variant, the robotic device comprises a vehicle; the object comprises one of a target or an obstacle; and the actuator activation is configured to cause the vehicle to perform at least one of a target approach or obstacle avoidance action.

In another implementation, the method includes: obtaining at least one image associated with surroundings of the apparatus using the sensor; analyzing the at least one image to detect a presence of an object in the at least one image; determining that the detected object comprises one of either a target or an obstacle; and causing the controller to selectively activate the actuator based on the determination.

These and other objects, features, and characteristics of the system and/or method disclosed herein, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the disclosure. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graphical illustration depicting a top view of robotic apparatus configured for optical distance detection, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating focal configuration of an optical apparatus used for distance detection, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration depicting distance detection volume associated with a three-dimensional image detector, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 4A is a graphical illustration depicting an object detection apparatus comprising a slanted linear image detector, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 4B is a graphical illustration depicting an object detection apparatus comprising a horizontal linear image detector, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 4C is a graphical illustration depicting a distance detection apparatus comprising detectors of multiple wavelengths, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 4D is a graphical illustration depicting an extended range distance detection apparatus comprising multiple detectors, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 5A is a block diagram depicting an exemplary object detection apparatus, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 5B is a block diagram depicting an exemplary object detection apparatus, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 6A is a plot illustrating output of an optical signal detection apparatus (e.g., the apparatus 500 of FIG. 5A), according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 6B is a plot illustrating output of an optical signal detection apparatus (e.g., the apparatus 530 of FIG. 5B), according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 7A is a plot illustrating de-focused images obtained with an optical distance detection system, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 7B is a plot illustrating in-focus images obtained with an optical distance detection system, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 8A is a plot illustrating a power spectrum of a de-focused image obtained with an optical distance detection system, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 8B is a plot illustrating a power spectrum of an in-focus image obtained with an optical distance detection system, according to one or more implementations.

FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram illustrating a computerized apparatus for implementing, inter alia, object detection in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 10 is a logical flow diagram illustrating a method of determining a salient feature using encoded video motion information, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 11A is a logical flow diagram illustrating a method of image processing useful for object detection by an optical apparatus, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 11B is a logical flow diagram illustrating a method of image processing useful for object detection by an optical apparatus, in accordance with one or more implementations.

FIG. 12 is a logical flow diagram illustrating a method of executing an action by a robotic vehicle, the action execution configured based on an outcome of object detection methodology of the disclosure, in accordance with one or more implementations.

All Figures disclosed herein are © Copyright 2014 Brain Corporation. All rights reserved.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Implementations of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings, which are provided as illustrative examples so as to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present technology. Notably, the figures and examples below are not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure to a single implementation, but other implementations are possible by way of interchange of or combination with some or all of the described or illustrated elements. Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to same or like parts.

Although the system(s) and/or method(s) of this disclosure have been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the disclosure is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present disclosure contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation may be combined with one or more features of any other implementation

In the present disclosure, an implementation showing a singular component should not be considered limiting; rather, the disclosure is intended to encompass other implementations including a plurality of the same component, and vice-versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise herein.

Further, the present disclosure encompasses present and future known equivalents to the components referred to herein by way of illustration.

As used herein, the term “bus” is meant generally to denote all types of interconnection or communication architecture that is used to access the synaptic and neuron memory. The “bus” could be optical, wireless, infrared or another type of communication medium. The exact topology of the bus could be for example standard “bus”, hierarchical bus, network-on-chip, address-event-representation (AER) connection, or other type of communication topology used for accessing, e.g., different memories in pulse-based system.

As used herein, the terms “computer”, “computing device”, and “computerized device”, include, but are not limited to, personal computers (PCs) and minicomputers, whether desktop, laptop, or otherwise, mainframe computers, workstations, servers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), handheld computers, embedded computers, programmable logic device, personal communicators, tablet or “phablet” computers, portable navigation aids, J2ME equipped devices, smart TVs, cellular telephones, smart phones, personal integrated communication or entertainment devices, or literally any other device capable of executing a set of instructions and processing an incoming data signal.

As used herein, the term “computer program” or “software” is meant to include any sequence or human or machine cognizable steps which perform a function. Such program may be rendered in virtually any programming language or environment including, for example, C/C++, C#, Fortran, COBOL, MATLAB™, PASCAL, Python, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML, SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environments such as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™ (including J2ME, Java Beans), Binary Runtime Environment (e.g., BREW), and other languages.

As used herein, the terms “connection”, “link”, “synaptic channel”, “transmission channel”, “delay line”, are meant generally to denote a causal link between any two or more entities (whether physical or logical/virtual), which enables information exchange between the entities.

As used herein the term feature may refer to a representation of an object edge, determined by change in color, luminance, brightness, transparency, texture, and/or curvature. The object features may comprise, inter alia, individual edges, intersections of edges (such as corners), orifices, and/or curvature

As used herein, the term “memory” includes any type of integrated circuit or other storage device adapted for storing digital data including, without limitation, ROM. PROM, EEPROM, DRAM, Mobile DRAM, SDRAM, DDR/2 SDRAM, EDO/FPMS, RLDRAM, SRAM, “flash” memory (e.g., NAND/NOR), memristor memory, and PSRAM.

As used herein, the terms “processor”, “microprocessor” and “digital processor” are meant generally to include all types of digital processing devices including, without limitation, digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (RISC), general-purpose (CISC) processors, microprocessors, gate arrays (e.g., field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs)), PLDs, reconfigurable computer fabrics (RCFs), array processors, secure microprocessors, and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Such digital processors may be contained on a single unitary IC die, or distributed across multiple components.

As used herein, the term “network interface” refers to any signal, data, or software interface with a component, network or process including, without limitation, those of the FireWire (e.g., FW400, FW800, and/or other FireWire implementation.), USB (e.g., USB2), Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000, Gigabit Ethernet, 10-Gig-E), MoCA, Coaxsys (e.g., TVnet™), radio frequency tuner (e.g., in-band or OOB, cable modem), Wi-Fi (802.11), WiMAX (802.16), PAN (e.g., 802.15), cellular (e.g., 3G, LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, GSM, and/or other cellular interface implementation) or IrDA families.

As used herein, the term “Wi-Fi” refers to, without limitation, any of the variants of IEEE-Std. 802.11 or related standards including 802.11 a/b/g/n/s/v and 802.11-2012.

As used herein, the term “wireless” means any wireless signal, data, communication, or other interface including without limitation Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3G (3GPP/3GPP2), HSDPA/HSUPA, TDMA, CDMA (e.g., IS-95A, WCDMA, and/or other wireless interface implementation.), FHSS, DSSS, GSM, PAN/802.15, WiMAX (802.16), 802.20, narrowband/FDMA, OFDM, PCS/DCS, LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, analog cellular, CDPD, RFID or NFC (e.g., EPC Global Gen. 2, ISO 14443, ISO 18000-3), satellite systems, millimeter wave or microwave systems, acoustic, and infrared (e.g., IrDA).

The present disclosure provides, among other things, apparatus and methods for detecting objects at a given distance from a moving device (such as e.g., a robotic device) in real time.

An optical distance/detection apparatus may comprise sensory apparatus, such as a camera comprising an imaging sensor with a lens configured to project a representation of a visual scene onto the imaging sensor. For a given lens, objects at different distances in front the lens may appear to focused at different ranges behind the lens. The lens may be characterized by a range of sharp focus (also referred to as depth of field). For a given range between the image sensor and the lens, one or more objects present within the range of focus may produce in-focus images. Objects disposed outside the range of focus may produce smeared (or out of focus) images. In-focus representations of objects may be characterized by a greater contrast parameter compared to out-of-focus representations. One or more images provided by the detection apparatus may be analyzed in order to determine image contrast parameter of a given image. Based on one or more criteria (e.g., the image contrast breaching a threshold), an object detection indication may be produced by the apparatus.

When operated from a moving vehicle or device (e.g., a car, an aerial vehicle) the image on the detector may gradually get sharper as the vehicle approaches an object. Upon breaching a given contrast (given sharpness) threshold, the detection apparatus may produce an indication conveying presence of an object within the range of focus in front of the lens.

FIG. 1 depicts a top view of mobile robotic apparatus comprising an optical object detection device configured for object detection in accordance with some implementations. The apparatus 100 may comprise for instance a robotic car, an unmanned aerial vehicle, and/or other apparatus configured to move in space in one or more dimensions. The apparatus 100 may comprise the optical object detection device 106. The apparatus 100 may navigate in a direction 104. One or more objects may be present in front of the apparatus 100, e.g., a ball 112 and a box 122, disposed at distance 110, 120, respectively, from the apparatus 100. The object detection device 106 may be configured to detect the presence of one or more objects (e.g., 112, 122) during, for example trajectory navigation by the apparatus 100 using the methodology of the disclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates a configuration of an optical apparatus used for object detection, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 300 of FIG. 2, may comprise a lens 302 characterized by a focal length 332. A portion of the space to the left of the lens 302 in FIG. 2 may be referred to as the front (e.g., object space). A lens may be characterized by a relative aperture (also referred to as the f-number and/or focal number and defined as a ratio of lens focal length (e.g., element 332 in FIG. 2) to the diameter of the lens entrance pupil).

The apparatus 300 may comprise an image sensor disposed behind the lens 304. In some implementations, the sensor may be located at a fixed distance from the lens, e.g., in the focal plane 334 of the lens 302.

The lens 302 may be characterized by an area of acceptable contrast which also may be referred to as a circle of confusion (CoC). In optics, a circle of confusion may correspond to a region in a plane of the detector formed by a cone of light rays from a lens that may not coming to a perfect focus when imaging a point source. The area of acceptable contrast may also be termed to as disk of confusion, circle of indistinctness, blur circle, or region. The area of acceptable contrast of the lens 302 (denoted by bold segment in FIG. 2) of extent 304 may correspond to an extent of acceptably sharp focus 324 in front of the lens 302. In some implementations, the dimension (e.g., vertical in FIG. 2) of the acceptable contrast 304 may be configured based on, for example, one or more criteria such as an acceptable difference in brightness between (i) pixels corresponding to the light rays falling onto the detector within the area 304, and (ii) pixels corresponding the light rays falling onto the focal plane outside the area 304. The magnitude of the pixel brightness difference may be configured in accordance with parameters of a particular application (e.g., object distance, size, shape, image resolution, acquisition time and/or other parameters). In some implementations of object detection from an aerial vehicle for example, the magnitude of the pixel brightness difference may be selected between 10% and 20%.

In some implementations of still or video image processing, dimension of the circle of confusion may be determined based on a size of the largest blur spot that may still be perceived by the processing apparatus as a point. In some photography implementations wherein the detector may comprise a human eye, a person with a good vision may be able to distinguish an image resolution of 5 line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm) at 0.25 in, which corresponds to CoC of 0.2 mm.

In one or more implementations of computerized detectors, the DOF dimension may be determined as

R˜1/dc, dc˜d/dr/Rv   (Eqn. 1)

where:

d is the viewing distance, dr is the minimum detectable resolution at a reference viewing distance, Rv—is the reference viewing distance.

For a given detector size and/or location, and sharpness threshold, the dimension 304 of the area of acceptable contrast may increase with an increasing f-number of the lens 302. By way of an illustration, the circle of confusion of a lens with f-number of 1.4 (f/1.4) will be twice that of the f/2.8 lens. Dimension of the area of acceptably sharp focus 324 in FIG. 2 (also referred to as the depth of field (DOF)) may be inversely proportional to the dimension 304 of the area of acceptable contrast and the lens f-number. In the above example, the DOF of the f/1.4 lens will be half that of the f/2.8 lens.

A plurality of objects (denoted by circles 312, 314, 316, 318 in FIG. 2) may be present in front of the lens 302. Axial extents denoted by arrows 322 and 326 in FIG. 2 may be referred to as out-of-focus portions, while the extent 324 may be referred to as the in-focus portion of the space in front of the lens. Objects that may be present within the DOF (e.g., the objects 314, 316 shown by solid circles in FIG. 2) produce in-focus image representations in the focal plane 334. Objects that may be present outside the DOF (e.g., the objects 312, 318 shown by open circles in FIG. 2) produce out-of-focus image representations in the focal plane 334. By way of an illustration, the object 312 may produce an out of focus image at the detector plane 334, the object 314 may produce an in-focus image at the detector plane 334.

In some implementations, a lens with a lower relative aperture (smaller f number) may be capable of producing a shallower depth of field (e.g., 324 in FIG. 2). An optical detection apparatus characterized by a shallow depth of field may reduce uncertainty associated with detecting objects using image contrast methodology described herein. A detection system 300 characterized by a shallower area of acceptably sharp focus may be used to achieve reliable detection (e.g., characterized by a lower rate of false positives) compared to a detection system characterized by a deeper area of acceptably sharp focus. In some implementations of object detection from a moving platform and/or detection of moving objects, a detection system characterized by the shallower DOF may be operated at an increased temporal resolution (compared to the deeper DOF system) in order to detect objects that may pass through the area of acceptably sharp focus.

In some implementations, e.g., such as illustrated in FIG. 1, the apparatus 200 may be disposed on a moving platform. As the platform approaches an object (e.g., 122 in FIG. 1) being present in the out-of focus area 322, the object, when at location 312 in FIG. 2, may produce an out of focus representation in the image. When the object becomes located within the apparatus 300 DOF (e.g., the location 314, and/or 316 of the extent 324 or there between), it may produce an in-focus representation. The in-focus representation may be characterized by one or more changes, such as e.g., an increased contrast as compared to the output focus representations. In such a case, analysis of the image contrast may be utilized in order to determine the presence of one or more objects in the image, e.g., as described below with respect to FIGS. 6-8B.

In some implementations, the contrast determination process may comprise one or more computer-implemented mathematical operations, including down-sampling the image produced by the detector; performing a high-pass filter operation on the acquired image; and/or determining a deviation parameter of pixels within the high-pass filtered image relative a reference value. FIG. 3 depicting an exemplary distance detection apparatus 400 comprising a three-dimensional image detector, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 400 may comprise for instance a lens 402, and a three dimensional image sensor 410. The image sensor may comprise a charge-coupled device (CCD), CMOS device, an active-pixel sensor (APS), photodiode array, and/or other sensor technology. The image sensor may be configured to provide two-dimensional (e.g. X-Y) matrices of a pixel intensity values refreshed at, e.g., a 25 Hz or other suitable frame rate. In one or more implementations, the image sensor may operate at a single wavelength, or at multiple wavelengths. It will be appreciated that while many applications of the apparatus 400 may be configured to operate within the visual band of wavelengths, the present disclosure contemplates use of other wavelengths of electromagnetic energy including, without limitation, those in IR, microwave, x-ray, and/or gamma-ray bands, or combinations of the foregoing. A given pixel may be characterized by one or more values, e.g., corresponding to individual wavelengths (R, G, B), and/or exposure. Individual values may be characterized by bit depth (e.g., comprising 8, 12, 16, or other number of bits). It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art when given this disclosure that the above-referenced image parameters are merely exemplary, and many other image representations (e.g., bitmap, luminance-chrominance (YUV, YCbCr), grayscale, and/or other image representations) are equally applicable to and useful with the various aspects of the present disclosure. Futhermore, data frames corresponding to other (non-visual) signal modalities such as infrared (IR), ultraviolet (UV) images may be compatible with the processing methodology of the disclosure, or yet other configurations.

The image sensor 410 may comprise one or more sensing layers arranged along dimension shown by arrow 404. Individual layers (not shown) may comprise a plurality of photo sensitive elements (photosites) configured to produce arrays of pixels. Individual sensing layers may be configured partially translucent so as to permit light delivered by the lens 402 propagation through a prior layer (with respect to the lens) to subsequent layer(s). Axial displacement of individual layers (e.g., along dimension 404) may produce an axial distribution of focal planes. Light rays propagating through the lens 402 at different angles may be focused at different locations, as shown by broken lines 406, 408 in FIG. 3. Spatial separation of multiples focal planes may enable detection of objects disposed within the extent 412 in front of the lens. Objects disposed at different ranges 414 from the lens within the extent 410 may produce in focus images at a respective focal plane of the image sensor 410. In some implementations, the apparatus 400 may be used to provide distance to the detected object.

FIG. 4A illustrates an object detection apparatus comprising a slanted linear image detector, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 420 of FIG. 4A may comprise a lens 402, and one or more image sensors 422, 424. Individual image sensors 422, 424 may comprise a linear array of photosites disposed at an angle with respect to the plane of the lens 402. Configuring the image sensor 422, 424 at an angle with respect to the lens 402 may enable the apparatus 420 to produce one or more areas of focus 426, 428. Areas of focus may be characterized by an axial horizontal extent, e.g., element 429 of the area 426 in FIG. 4A. Slanted areas of focus may correspond to multiple in-focus extents to the left of the lens 402, e.g. shown by arrows 423, 425. Objects occurring within the one or more extents 423, 425 may produce an in-focus representation on the respective sensor. Use of one or more slanted image sensors may enable the apparatus 420 to detect objects at multiple locations that differ by distance from the lens plane and the cross axis position. In some implementations, detection of objects at multiple distances may enable a robotic vehicle to determine as to whether obtain information if its approaching an object (or if it is approached by an object) and undertake a relevant action (e.g. avoid an obstacle and/or move away from a trajectory of another object). In one or more implementations, the detection apparatus 420 may be employed to determine shape and/or aspect ratio of an object. By way of an illustration, number and/or location of activated slant sensors (e.g., 422, 424) of the slant array may convey information about object's location, orientation and/or shape.

FIG. 4B illustrates an object detection apparatus comprising a horizontal linear image detector, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 430 of FIG. 4B may comprise a lens 402, and an image sensor 432 comprising a linear array of photosites disposed along axial direction of the lens 402. Disposing the image sensor 432 at a right angle with respect to the lens 402 plane may enable the apparatus 430 to produce in-focus images when an object may be present within the in-focus range 433 in front of the lens 402. When one or more objects may occur within the range 433 at different ranges from the lens, distance to individual objects may be resolved by, in one implementation, analyzing in-focus representations corresponding to light rays 436, 438 in FIG. 4B.

FIG. 4C illustrates a distance detection apparatus comprising an image sensor comprising detectors of multiple wavelengths, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 440 of FIG. 4C may comprise a lens 402, and an image sensor 441. The image sensor 441 may comprise a linear array of photosites disposed along focal plane direction (vertical in FIG. 4C) of the lens 402. The photosite array may comprise elements configured to respond to light waves of different wavelength. The sensor 441 shown in FIG. 4C comprises three element types depicted by open, solid, and hashed rectangles denoted 444, 446, 442, respectively. Individual photosites of a given type (e.g., 444, 446, 442 in FIG. 4C) may be configured in an array, thus producing multiple image sensors disposed within the focal plane of the lens 402.

Due to light dispersion within the lens, light traveling along different paths may focus in different areas behind the lens. Conversely, objects disposed at different distances from the lens may produce in-focus representations at image sensors responding to different light wavelengths. By way of an illustration, light from objects within the distance range 453 may travel along ray paths 454 and produce in focus image on photosite type 444 array. Light from objects within the distance range 455 may travel along ray paths 456 and produce in focus image on photosite type 446 array. Light from objects within the distance range 457 may travel along ray paths 452 and produce in focus image on photosite type 442 array. Accordingly, the optical apparatus comprising one or more image sensors operating at multiple wavelengths may be capable of providing distance information for objects located at different distance from the lens. Although chromatic aberration is known in the arts, most modem lenses are constructed such as to remove or minimize effects of chromatic aberration. Such achromatic and/or apochromatic lenses may be quite costly, heavy, and/or large compared to simpler lenses with chromatic aberration. The methodology of the present disclosure may enable use of simpler, less costly, and/or more compact lens designs for detecting objects compared to existing approaches.

FIG. 4D illustrates an extended range distance detection apparatus comprising multiple detectors, according to one or more implementations.

The apparatus 480 of FIG. 4B may comprise a lens 402, and multiple image sensors 482, 484, 486. Individual image sensors 482, 484, 486 may be configured to respond to light of one or more wavelengths. Individual image sensors 482, 484, 486 may be disposed at different optical distances from the lens 402. In some implementations, such as shown in FIG. 4D, one or more light deflection components may be used in order to divert a portion of light gathered by the lens into two or more portions. In one or more implementations, the components 488, 490 may comprise a beam splitter, a polarizing prism, and/or a thin half-silvered mirror (pellicle mirror).

By way of an illustration, a portion of the light from the lens 402 may be diverted by semi-permeable mirror 488 along direction shown by arrow 496 towards the sensor 486 while a portion 492 of light may be passed through towards the sensor 482. All or a portion of the light from the lens 402 may be diverted by the semi-permeable mirror 490 along direction shown by arrow 494 towards the sensor 484. A portion 492 of the incident light may be passed through towards the sensor 482. Cumulative path lengths for light sensed by elements 482, 484, 486 may also be configured different from one another. Accordingly, the light traveling along paths denoted by arrows 481, 483, 485 may correspond to depth of field regions 493, 495, 497 in front of the lens 402 in FIG. 4D. Optical apparatus comprising multiple image sensors characterized by different light path lengths may be capable of providing detection information for objects located at different distance from the lens.

FIG. 5A is a block diagram depicting an exemplary object detection apparatus, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 500 of FIG. 5A may comprise one or more sensors 504 configured to produce one or more pixels corresponding to sensory input 502. In one or more implementations, the sensory input may comprise light gathered by a lens. In one or more implementations of optical distance detection, the sensor component 504 may comprise one or more image sensor components, such as e.g., those described above with respect to FIGS. 3-4D.

The sensor 504 may provide output 506 comprising one or more pixels. In some implementations, the output 506 may comprise an array of pixels characterized by one or more channels (e.g., R,G,B) and a bit depth (e.g., 8/12/16 bits).

The output 506 may be high-pass (HP) filtered by the filter component 520. In some implementations, the filter component 520 may be configured to downsample the input 506. The filter component 520 operation may comprise a convolution operation with a Laplacian and/or another sharpening kernel, a difference of Gaussian operation configured to reduce low frequency energy, a combination thereof, and/or other operations configured to reduce low frequency energy content. In some implementations, the filter component 520 may be configured as described below with respect to FIGS. 6A.

In some implementations, the output 506 might be cropped prior to further processing (e.g., filtering, and/or transformations). Multiple crops of an image in the output 506 (performed with different cropping setting) may be used. In some implementations crops of the high-passed image may be utilized. In some implementations, the output 506 may be processed using a band-pass filter operation. The band pass filter may comprise a high-pass filtering operation, subsampling, and/or a blurring filter operation. The blurring filter operation on an image may comprise a convolution of a smoothing kernel (e.g., Gaussian, box, circular, and/or other kernel whose Fourier transform has most of energy in a low part of spectrum) with the image.

Filtered output 508 may be provided to a processing component 522 configured to execute a detection process. The detection process may comprise determination of a parameter, quantity, or other value, such as e.g., a contrast parameter. In one or more implementations, the contrast parameter may be configured based on a maximum absolute deviation (MAD) of pixels within the filtered image from a reference value. The reference value may comprise a fixed pre-computed value, an image mean, image median, and/or a value determined using statistics of multiple images. In some implementations, the contrast parameter for a plurality of images value may be low-pass filtered using a running mean, an exponential filter, and/or other filter approach configured to reduce inter-image variability of the detection process, or accomplish some other desirable operation to enhance detection. The averaging window may be configured in accord with requirements of a given application. By way of an illustration, a detection apparatus configured to detect objects in a video acquired at 25 fps from a robotic rover device may utilize averaging window between 2 and 50 frames. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the arts that averaging parameters may be configured based on requirements of an applications, e.g., vehicle speed, motion of objects, object size, and/or other parameters. For autonomous ground vehicle navigation the averaging window may be selected smaller than 2 seconds.

The contrast parameter may be evaluated in light of one or more detection or triggering criteria; e.g., compared to a threshold, and/or analysis of a value produced by the contrast determination process. Responsive to the contrast parameter for a given image breaching the threshold (e.g., 604, 624 in FIGS. 6A-6B, below), the processing component 522 may produce output 510 indicative of a presence of an object in the sensory input 500. In one or more implementations, the threshold value may be selected and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters. By way of an illustration, the threshold may be configured to provide greater sensitivity at dusk/dawn, and reduce sensitivity during the day and/or increase sensitivity in high light conditions, while reducing sensitivity in low light conditions.

FIG. 5B illustrates an exemplary object detection apparatus, according to one or more implementations. The apparatus 530 of FIG. 5B may comprise one or more sensors 504 configured to produce output 536 comprising one or more pixels corresponding to sensory input 502. In one or more implementations, the sensory input may comprise light gathered by a lens. In one or more implementations of optical distance detection, the sensor component 504 may comprise one or more image sensor components described above with respect to FIGS. 3-4D. The output 536 may comprise an array of pixels characterized by one or more channels (e.g., R,G,B) and a bit depth (e.g., 8/12/16 bits).

The output 536 may be processed by a processing component 538. In some implementations, the component 538 may be configured to assess spatial and/or temporal characteristics of the camera component output 536. In some implementations, the assessment process may comprise determination of a two-dimensional image spectrum using, e.g., a discrete Fourier transform described below with respect to FIG. 6B. The resultant spectrum may be analyzed to evaluate high-frequency (small scale) energy content. In some implementations, the high frequency energy content determination may comprise a determination of energy parameter (Ehi) associated with energy content in the image spectrum at spatial scales that are lower than 0.5-2/3 of the Nyquist frequency (3-10) pixels.

Responsive to a determination that the high frequency (small spatial scale) energy content in the image meets one or more criteria (e.g., breaches a threshold), the processing component 538 may produce output 540 indicative of a presence of an object in the sensory input 502. In one or more implementations, the threshold value may be selected and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters.

In one or more implementations, the object detection may be effectuated based on a comparison of the Ehi parameter to another energy parameter (El) associated with energy content in the image spectrum at spatial scales that exceed a prescribed number of pixels.

In one or more implementations, processing components 520, 522, 524, 538 may be embodied within one or more integrated circuits, one or more computerized devices, and/or implemented using machine executable instructions (e.g., a software library) executed by one or more processors and/or ASICs.

FIGS. 6A-8B illustrate operation of object detection system of the disclosure configured in accordance with one or more implementations.

One or more images may an acquired using, e.g. a camera component 504 shown and described with respect to FIG. 5A mounted on a vehicle (e.g., a robotic vehicle 100 such as that shown in FIG. 1). The vehicle may approach an object (e.g., a flower). FIGS. 7A-7B present two exemplary images acquired with a camera apparatus comprising a lens (e.g., 302 in FIG. 2) characterized by an exemplary f/1.8 aperture and 35 mm focal length, and an imaging sensor (e.g., 304 in FIG. 2) characterized by dimensions of 23.1 mm by 15.4 mm. The image sensor may comprise an array of photosites and be characterized by a physical resolution (e.g., 6,016×4,000) of photosites. The image sensor may produce an image comprising an array of pixels. Individual pixels may correspond to signal associated with a given photosite (raw resolution) or a group of photosites (subsampled image). Images provided by the sensor may be down-sampled to e.g., 320 pixels×180 pixels rectangle and converted to grayscale 8-bit representation. Various other resolutions, bit depths and/or image representations may be utilized. The pixels dimension may determine the smallest resolvable spatial scale (e.g., smallest change) in the image. For example, smaller pixels may enable resolving of smaller scales (higher detail) in the image,

Image 700 in FIG. 7A represents the down-sampled image comprising an out of-focus representation of the object (e.g., the flower), denoted by arrow 702. Image 720 in FIG. 7B represents the down-sampled image comprising an in-focus representation 722 of the flower.

The images may be high-pass processed by a filtering operation. The filtering operation may comprise determination of a Gaussian blurred image using a Gaussian kernel. In the implementation illustrated in FIGS. 6A-7B the Gaussian kernel standard deviation is selected equal to 5 pixels in vertical and horizontal dimensions. It may be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant arts that the image acquisition and/or processing parameters (e.g., bit depth, down-sampled image size, Gaussian kernel, and/or other parameters) may be configured in accordance with application requirements; e.g., expected object size, processing and/or energy capacity available for object detection, image sensor size, resolution, frame rate, noise floor, and/or other parameters.

In one or more implementations, the high-passed image Ih may be obtained by subtracting Gaussian blurred image Ig from the original image I, as follows:

Ih=I+m−Ig   (Eqn. 2)

where m denotes an offset value. In some implementations (e.g., such as illustrated in FIGS. 6A, 7A-7B), the offset m may be selected equal to a middle value of the grayscale brightness level (e.g., 128).

Panels 710, 740 FIGS. 7A-7B, respectively, depict output of the filtering operation of Eqn. As may be observed in FIG. 7A, image of panel 710 (corresponding to the out of focus image of panel 700) is substantially void of high frequency content (e.g., the location 712 corresponding to the representation of the flower does not contain readily discernable feature(s)). As may be observed in FIG. 7B, the image of panel 740 (corresponding to the in-focus image of panel 720) comprises a plurality of high frequency features (e.g., the flower representation the location 732 may be readily discerned from the grey background).

In order to obtain a quantitative measure of an object presence in a given image (e.g., 720 in FIG. 7B), the corresponding high-pass filtered image (e.g., 740 in FIG. 7B) may be analyzed. The analysis may comprise for instance determination of deviation of pixel values from the mean intensity value within the image (e.g., 128 in some implementations of 8-bit greyscale images). In some implementations, the analysis may comprise determination of a contrast parameter configured based on a maximum of absolute deviation of a pixel value within the image from the image median value. In some implementations, the contrast parameter may be low-pass filtered using a running mean, an exponential filter, and/or other filter approach configured to reduce frame-to-frame variability. The exemplary filtered contrast parameter data shown by curve 602 in FIG. 6A were obtained using a running mean window of 25 frames in width, although it is appreciated that other values may readily be used consistent with the present disclosure. Temporal filtering may be employed in order to reduce number of false positives generated e.g. by thermal noise on the detector, camera shake, and/or other sources of noise.

The contrast parameter for a given image may be evaluated in light of one or more criteria (e.g., compared to a threshold) in order to determine presence of an object in the associated image. FIG. 6A illustrates contrast parameter values (curve 602) obtained for a plurality of images and the corresponding detection output (curve comprising portions 614, 616, 618. Data shown by curve 602 may correspond to output 510 of the component 522 of the detection the apparatus 500 of FIG. 5A. Data shown by segments 614, 616, 618 may correspond to output 512 of the apparatus 500 of FIG. 5A.

Detection threshold used for determining the presence of an object is shown by broken line 604 in FIG. 6A. In one or more implementations, the threshold value 604 may be selected and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters. Values of the curve 602 that fall in the range 608 below the threshold 604 may cause a negative detection signal (e.g., equal to zero as shown by the segments 614, 618 in FIG. 6A). Values of the curve 602 that fall in the range 606 at and/or above the threshold 604 may cause a positive detection signal (e.g., equal to one as shown by segment 616 in FIG. 6A).

FIGS. 6B and 8A-8B illustrate object detection using of spectral approach to image contrast analysis (by, e.g., the apparatus 530 of FIG. 5B), according to one or more implementations.

The input image (e.g., image 700, 720) may be transformed using a Fourier transformation, e.g., discrete Fourier transform (DFT), cosine Fourier transform, a Fast Fourier transform (FFT) or other spatial scale transformation. FIG. 8A illustrates a power spectrum of the de-focused image shown in panel 700 of FIG. 7A. FIG. 8B illustrates a power spectrum of the in-focus image shown in panel 720 of FIG, 7B.

The image spectra may be partitioned into a low-frequency portion and a high frequency portion. In some implementations, e.g., such as illustrated in FIG. 6B, the spectral partitioning may be configured based on an elliptical or circular curve area around the origin (e.g., zero frequency point). In some implementations, e.g., shown in FIG. 6B, the data were obtained using an ellipse with (x,y) axes selected at (37, 65) units of cycles along corresponding axis. Low frequency energy portion Elo may be obtained by determining a sum of power spectral values within the ellipse area. The high frequency energy portion Ehi may be obtained by determining a sum of power spectral values outside the ellipse area.

Detection of an object in a given image may comprise determination of a contrast parameter for a given image. In some implementations, the contrast parameter may be configured based on a comparison of the high frequency energy portion and the low frequency energy portion. In some implementations, the contrast parameter (C) may be determined based on a ratio or other relationship of the high frequency energy portion and the low frequency energy portion, such as the exemplary relationship of Eqn. 2 below.

C=Ehi/Elo   (Eqn. 2)

The contrast parameter for a given image may be compared to a threshold in order to determine presence of an object in the associated image. FIG. 6B presents the contrast parameter (curve 622) for a series of images acquired by an optical object detection device disposed on a moving platform. The thick segments 634, 636, 638 in FIG. 6B depicts the detection output corresponding detection output. Data shown by segments 634, 636, 638 may correspond to output 540 of the component 538 of the detection the apparatus 530 of FIG. 5B.

The detection threshold used for determining the presence of an object is shown by the broken line 624 in FIG. 6B. In one or more implementations, the threshold value 624 may be selected (e.g., equal one in FIG. 6B) and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters. Values of the contrast parameter of curve 622 that fall in the range 628 below the threshold 624 may cause a negative detection signal (e.g., equal to zero as shown by the segments 634, 638 in FIG. 6B). Values of the curve 622 that fall in the range 626 at and/or above the threshold 624 may cause a positive detection signal (e.g., equal to one as shown by segment 636 in FIG. 6B).

FIG. 9 illustrates a computerized apparatus for implementing, inter cilia, object detection in accordance with one or more implementations. The apparatus 900 may comprise a processing module 916 configured to receive sensory input from sensory block 920 (e.g., camera 106 in FIG. I). The processing module 916 may be configured to implement signal processing functionality (e.g., object detection).

The apparatus 900 may comprise memory 914 configured to store executable instructions (e.g., operating system and/or application code, raw and/or processed data such as raw image fames, image spectrum, and/or contrast parameter, information related to one or more detected objects, and/or other information).

In some implementations, the processing module 916 may interface with one or more of the mechanical 918, sensory 920, electrical 922, power components 924, communications interface 926, and/or other components via driver interfaces, software abstraction layers, and/or other interfacing techniques. Thus, additional processing and memory capacity may be used to support these processes. However, it will be appreciated that these components may be fully controlled by the processing module. The memory and processing capacity may aid in processing code management for the apparatus 900 (e.g. loading, replacement, initial startup and/or other operations). Consistent with the present disclosure, the various components of the device may be remotely disposed from one another, and/or aggregated. For example, the instructions operating the detection process may be executed on a server apparatus that may control the mechanical components via a network or a radio connection. In some implementations, multiple mechanical, sensory, electrical units, and/or other components may be controlled by a single robotic controller via network/radio connectivity.

The mechanical components 918 may include virtually any type of device capable of motion and/or performance of a desired function or task. Examples of such devices may include one or more of motors, servos, pumps, hydraulics, pneumatics, stepper motors, rotational plates, micro-electro-mechanical devices (MEMS), electroactive polymers, shape memory alloy (SMA) activation, and/or other devices. The sensor devices may interface with the processing module, and/or enable physical interaction and/or manipulation of the device.

The sensory component may be configured to provide sensory input to the processing component. In some implementations, the sensory input may comprise camera output images.

The electrical components 922 may include virtually any electrical device for interaction and manipulation of the outside world. Examples of such electrical devices may include one or more of light/radiation generating devices (e.g. LEDs, IR sources, light bulbs, and/or other devices), audio devices, monitors/displays, switches, heaters, coolers, ultrasound transducers, lasers, and/or other electrical devices. These devices may enable a wide array of applications for the apparatus 900 in industrial, hobbyist, building management, medical device, military/intelligence, and/or other fields.

The communications interface may include one or more connections to external computerized devices to allow for, inter cilia, management of the apparatus 900. The connections may include one or more of the wireless or wireline interfaces discussed above, and may include customized or proprietary connections for specific applications. The communications interface may be configured to receive sensory input from an external camera, a user interface (e.g., a headset microphone, a button, a touchpad, and/or other user interface), and/or provide sensory output (e.g., voice commands to a headset, visual feedback, and/or other sensory output).

The power system 924 may be tailored to the needs of the application of the device. For example, for a small hobbyist robot or aid device, a wireless power solution (e.g. battery, solar cell, inductive (contactless) power source, rectification, and/or other wireless power solution) may be appropriate. However, for building management applications, battery backup/direct wall power may be superior, in some implementations. In addition, in some implementations, the power system may be adaptable with respect to the training of the apparatus 900. Thus, the apparatus 900 may improve its efficiency (to include power consumption efficiency) through learned management techniques specifically tailored to the tasks performed by the apparatus 900.

FIGS. 10-12 illustrate methods 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200 for determining and using object information from images. The operations of methods 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200 presented below are intended to be illustrative, In some implementations, methods 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200 are illustrated in FIGS. 10-12 and described below is not intended to be limiting.

In some implementations, methods 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information). The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of methods 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium. The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of methods 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300.

FIG. 10 illustrates a method of determining presence of an object in an image using image contrast information in accordance with one or more implementations.

At operation 1002 of method 1000, one or more input images may be acquired. In one or more implementations, individual images may be provided by an optical apparatus (e.g., 200 of FIG. 2) comprising a lens and an image sensor (e.g., CCD, CMOS device, and/or APS, photodiode arrays, and/or other image sensors). In some implementations, the input images may comprise a pixel stream downloaded from a file, such as a stream of two-dimensional matrices of red green blue RGB values (e.g., refreshed at a 25 Hz or other suitable frame rate), It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art when given this disclosure that the above-referenced image parameters are merely exemplary, and many other image representations (e.g., bitmap, luminance-chrominance YUV, YCbCr, grayscale, and/other image representations) may be applicable to and useful with the various implementations. The images may form real-time (live) video.

At operation 1004, image contrast parameter may be determined. In one or more implementations, the contrast parameter determination may be effectuated by a processing apparatus (e.g., the apparatus described with respect to FIGS. 5A-5B) using an image-domain based approach (e.g., such as described with respect to FIG. 6A), an image spectrum domain based approach (e.g., such as described with respect to FIG. 6B and/or Eqn. 2), and/or other applicable methodologies. In some implementations, (e.g., such as described with respect to FIG. 6A, the contrast parameter for a given image may be obtained using a smoothing operation (e.g., based on a block averaging filter, exponential filter, and/or other operation configured to reduce variability of the contrast parameter from one image to another).

At operation 1006, a determination may be made as to whether the parameter(s) of interest meet the relevant criterion or criteria (e.g., the contrast parameter is within detection range). In some implementations, the determination of operation 1006 may be configured based on a comparison of the contrast parameter to a threshold, e.g., as shown and described with respect to FIGS. 6A-6B. In one or more implementations, the threshold value may be selected (e.g., equal one in FIG. 6B) and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters.

Responsive to a determination at operation 1006 that the contrast parameter is within the detection range (e.g., breached the threshold), the method 1000 may proceed to operation 1008 wherein an object detection indication may be produced. In some implementations, the object detection indication may comprise a message, a logic level transition, a pulse, a voltage, a register value and/or other means configured to communicate the detection indication to, e.g., a robotic controller.

FIG. 11 A illustrates a method of image analysis useful for object detection by an optical apparatus, in accordance with one or more implementations. The operations of method 1100 may be performed by an optical object detection apparatus (e.g., such as that of FIGS. 2-5A) disposed on, e.g., a mobile robotic device.

At operation 1102, an image may be obtained. In some implementations, the image may comprise a 2-array of pixels characterized by one or more channels (grayscale, RGB, and/or other representations) and/or pixel bit depth.

At operation 1104, the obtained image may be evaluated. In some implementations, the image evaluation may be configured to determine a processing load of an image analysis apparatus (e.g., components of the apparatus 500, 530 of FIGS. 5A-5B, and/or 916 of FIG. 9, described above). The evaluation may comprise re-sampling (e.g., down sampling/up-sampling) the image to a given reference resolution. By way of an illustration, an image analysis component may comprise an ASIC configured to accept images of a given resolution (e.g., 320×180 pixels, 640×360 pixels, and/or other resolution). The operation 1104 may be configured to adapt the input image into a compatible resolution. In some implementations, the image evaluation operation may comprise modification of image bit depths (e.g., from 12 to 8 bits), and/or a channel combination operation e.g., configured to produce a grayscale image from RGB image.

At operation 1106 a high-passed version of the image produced by operation 1104 may be obtained. In one or more implementations, the high-pass filtered image version may be produced using a filter operation configured based on a convolution operation with a Laplacian, a difference of Gaussian operation, a combination thereof, and/or other operations. In some implementations, filter operation may be configured based on a hybrid kernel determined using a convolution of the Gaussian smoothing kernel with the Laplacian kernel. The hybrid kernel may be convolved with the image produced by operation 1104 in order to obtain the high-pass filtered image version. In some implementations of down-sampling and high-pass filtering, the image may be convolved with the processing kernel at a subset of locations in the image corresponding to the subsampling parameters, by applying the kernel on a grid of n pixels, where n is the down-sampling parameter.

At operation 1108, a contrast parameter of the high-pass filtered image may be determined. In one or more implementations, the contrast parameter determination may be effectuated by the processing component 522 of the apparatus 500 described with respect to FIG. 5A using an image-domain based approach. The contrast parameter determination using the image-domain based approach may comprise determination of a maximum absolute deviation of individual pixel values within the filtered image from a reference value. The reference value may comprise a fixed pre-computed value, an image mean, image median, and/or a value determined using statistics of multiple images. In some implementations, the contrast parameter for a plurality of images value may be low-pass filtered using a running mean, an exponential filter, and/or other filter approach configured to reduce inter-image variability of the detection process.

At operation 1110, a determination may be made as to whether the contrast parameter may fall within detection range. In some implementations, the determination of operation 1110 may be configured based on a comparison of the contrast parameter to a threshold, e.g., as shown and described with respect to FIG. 6A. In one or more implementations, the threshold value may be selected (e.g., equal to 12% of the maximum deviation as in FIG. 6A) and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters.

Responsive to a determination at operation 1110 that the contrast parameter may be within the detection range (e.g., breached the threshold), the method 1100 may proceed to operation 1112 wherein an object detection indication may be produced. In some implementations, the object detection indication may comprise a message, a logic level transition, a pulse, a voltage, a register value and/or other means configured to communicate the detection indication to, e.g., a robotic controller, an alert indication to a user, and/or to another entity.

FIG. 11B illustrates a method of image analysis useful for object detection by an optical apparatus, in accordance with one or more implementations. Operations of method 1130 may be performed by an optical object detection apparatus (e.g., of FIGS. 2-4D, 5B) disposed on a mobile robotic device.

At operation 1122 an image may be obtained. In some implementations, the image may comprise a 2-array of pixels characterized by one or more channels (grayscale, RGB, and/or other representations) and/or pixel bit depth.

At operation 1124, the image may be evaluated. In some implementations, the image evaluation may be configured to determine a processing load of an image analysis apparatus (e.g., components of the apparatus 530 of FIGS. 5B, and/or 916 of FIG. 9, described above). The evaluation may comprise re-sampling (e.g., down sampling/up-sampling) the image to a given reference resolution. By way of an illustration, an image analysis component may comprise an ASIC configured to accept images of a given resolution (e.g., 320×180 pixels, 640×360 pixels, and/or other resolution). The operation 1124 may be configured to adapt the input image into a compatible resolution. In some implementations, the image evaluation operation may comprise modification of image bit depths (e.g., from 12 to 8 bits), and/or a channel combination operation e.g., configured to produce a grayscale image from RGB image.

At operation 1126, a spectrum of the image produced by operation 1124 may be obtained. In one or more implementations, the spectrum may be determined using a discrete Fourier transform, and/or other transformation.

At operation 1128, a contrast parameter of the image may be determined. In one or more implementations, the contrast parameter determination may be effectuated by the processing component 538 of the apparatus 530 described with respect to FIG. 5B using an image spectrum-domain based approach spectral domain based approach (e.g., such as described with respect to FIG. 6B and/or Eqn. 2). The contrast parameter determination using the image spectrum-domain based approach may comprise partitioning of the image spectrum into a low spatial frequency portion and a high spatial frequency portion. In some implementations, the spectrum partitioning may be configured by selecting a first area within e.g., circular, elliptical and/or other shape, around the origin (e.g., zero frequency), and a second area comprising the remaining portion of the spectrum (i.e., outside the ellipse/circle). The contrast image parameter may be determined for instance using a ratio of integral power within the first are to the integral power within the second area. In some implementations of a detection system with sensors elements disposed along multiple dimensions (e.g., as in FIG. 3, FIG. 4A, and/or FIG. 4D, image spectrum analysis may enable determination of objects of one or more orientation. For example, a given detector configuration may be more sensitive to objects of one orientation (e.g., vertical) and less sensitive to objects of another orientation (e.g., horizontal). In some implementations, an asymmetrical Laplacian kernel and/or Gabor type filter may be used to facilitate detection of objects at a target orientation.

At operation 1130, a determination may be made as to whether the contrast parameter may fall within detection range. In some implementations, the determination of operation 1130 may be configured based on a comparison of the contrast parameter to a threshold, e.g., as shown and described with respect to FIG. 6B. In one or more implementations, the threshold value may be selected (e.g., equal one as in FIG. 6B) and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters, as previously described herein.

Responsive to a determination at operation 1130 that the contrast parameter is within the detection range (e.g., breached the threshold) the method 1120 may proceed to operation 1132, wherein an object detection indication may be produced. In some implementations, the object detection indication may comprise a message, a logic level transition, a pulse, a wireless transmission, a voltage, a register value and/or other means configured to communicate the detection indication to, e.g., a robotic controller, an alert indication to a user, and/or to another entity.

FIG, 12 illustrates a method of executing an action by a robotic vehicle, the action execution configured based on an outcome of object detection methodology of the disclosure, in accordance with one or more implementations.

At operation 1202, a vehicle (e.g., the vehicle 100 of FIG. 1) may be operated, such as to for example navigate a trajectory. The trajectory navigation may be configured to for instance track and/or acquire video of a subject of interest (e.g., a user) from an aerial vehicle (e.g., a quad-copter), for example as described in U.S. Patent Application Ser. Nos. 62/007,311, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TRACKING USING AERIAL VIDEO”, filed on Jun. 3, 2014 the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some implementations, the vehicle may comprise a robotic device equipped with a learning controller, e.g., such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,530, entitled “ADAPTIVE PREDICTOR APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed herewith on Mar. 15, 2013, the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some implementations, the trajectory navigation may comprise one or more actions configured to enable landing of the aerial vehicle, e.g., as described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/285,466, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR ROBOTIC OPERATION USING VIDEO IMAGERY”, filed herewith on May 22, 2014, and/or 14/285,414, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR DISTANCE ESTIMATION USING MULTIPLE IMAGE SENSORS”, filed on May 22, 2014, each of the foregoing incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

At operation 1204, an image of the surrounding may be obtained. In one or more implementation, the image may comprise representation of one or more objects in the surroundings (e.g., the objects 112, 122 in FIG. 1).

At operation 1206, the image may be analyzed using to obtain contrast parameter. In one or more implementations, the contrast parameter determination may be configured using an image-domain approach (e.g., described above with respect to FIGS. 5A, 6A, 7A-7B, and/or 11A) or an image spectrum-domain approach (e.g., described above with respect to FIGS. 5B, 6B, 8A-8B, and/or 11B).

At operation 1208, a determination may be made as to whether an object may be present in the image obtained at operation 1204. In some implementations, the object presence may be determined based on a comparison of the contrast parameter to a threshold; e.g., as shown and described with respect to FIGS. 6A-6B. In one or more implementations, the threshold value may be selected (e.g., equal one as in FIG. 6B) and/or configured dynamically based on, e.g., ambient light conditions, time of day, and/or other parameters.

Responsive to a determination at operation 1208 that the object is present, the method 1200 may proceed to operation 1210, wherein the trajectory may be adapted. In some implementations, the object presence may correspond to a target being present in the surroundings and/or an obstacle present in the path of the vehicle. The trajectory adaptation may comprise alteration of vehicle course, speed, and/or other parameter. The trajectory adaptation may be configured based on one or more characteristics of the object (e.g., persistence over multiple frames, distance, location, and/or other parameters). In some implementations of target approach and/or obstacle avoidance by a robotic vehicle, when a target may be detected, the trajectory adaptation may be configured to reduce distance between the target and the vehicle (e.g., during landing, approaching a home base, a trash can, and/or other action). When an obstacle may be detected, the trajectory adaptation may be configured to maintain distance (e.g., stop), increase distance (e.g., go away), alter course (e.g., turn) in order to avoid collision. In some implementations, target/obstacle discrimination may be configured based on object color (e.g., approach red ball avoid all other objects); object reflectivity (approach bright objects), shape, orientation, and or other characteristics. In some implementations, object discrimination may be configured based on input from other sensors (e.g., RFID signal, radio beacon signal, acoustic pinger signal), location of the robotic device (e.g., when the vehicle is in the middle of a room all objects are treated as obstacles), and/or other approaches.

Although the above application of the object detection methodology is described for a vehicle navigation application, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the arts that various other implementations of the methodology of the present disclosure may be utilized. By way of an illustration, a security camera device may be used to observe and detect potential intruders (e.g., based on sudden appearance of objects) and/or detect theft (e.g., based on a sudden disappearance of previously present objects)

Implementations of the principles of the disclosure may be further applicable to a wide assortment of applications including computer-human interaction (e.g., recognition of gestures, voice, posture, face, and/or other interactions), controlling processes (e.g., processes associated with an industrial robot, autonomous and other vehicles, and/or other processes), augmented reality applications, access control (e.g., opening a door based on a gesture, opening an access way based on detection of an authorized person), detecting events (e.g., for visual surveillance or people or animal counting, tracking).

A video processing system of the disclosure may be implemented in a variety of ways such as, for example, a software library, an IP core configured for implementation in a programmable logic device(e.g., FPGA), an ASIC, a remote server, comprising a computer readable apparatus storing computer executable instructions configured to perform feature detection. Myriad other applications exist that will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.

Although the system(s) and/or method(s) of this disclosure have been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the disclosure is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present disclosure contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions embodied thereon, the instructions being executable on a processing apparatus to detect an object in an image by at least: producing a high-pass filtered version of the image, the high-pass filtered version comprising a plurality of pixels; for at least some of the plurality of pixels, determining a deviation parameter between the value of a given pixel and a reference value; and based on the deviation parameter meeting a criterion, providing an indication of the object being present in the image.
 2. The non-transitory medium of claim 1, wherein: the high-pass filtered version of the image is produced based at least on a first convolution operation between a kernel and the image, the kernel characterized by a kernel dimension; and the convolution operation is configured to reduce energy-associated spatial scales in the image that are lower than the kernel dimension.
 3. The non-transitory medium of claim 2, wherein: the kernel is configured based at least on a second convolution operation of a first matrix, the first matrix configured based at least on a Laplacian operator, and a second matrix configured based at least on a Gaussian operator; and the image is characterized by image dimension, the image dimension exceeding the kernel dimension by at least ten times (10×).
 4. The non-transitory medium of claim 2, wherein the high-pass filtered version of the image is further produced based on a difference between the image and a smoothed version of the image, the smoothed version of the image obtained using one or more smoothing operations applied to the image.
 5. The non-transitory medium of claim 2, wherein the reference value comprises a mean or median brightness of the image; and the deviation parameter comprises a maximum absolute value of a difference between a given pixel value and the reference value.
 6. The non-transitory medium of claim 2, wherein the contrast parameter is determined based at least on a temporal average of a plurality of contrast parameters, individual ones of the plurality of contrast parameters corresponding to a plurality of images.
 7. The non-transitory medium of claim 1, wherein the criterion comprises meeting or exceeding a prescribed threshold.
 8. An optical object detection apparatus comprising: a lens characterized by a depth of field range; an image sensor configured to provide an image comprising one or more pixels; and a logic in communication with the image sensor and configured to: evaluate at least a portion of the image to determine an image contrast parameter; and produce an object detection indication based on the contrast parameter meeting one or more criteria, the object indication configured to convey presence of the object within the depth of field range.
 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein: the image sensor comprises an array of photo-sensitive elements arranged in a plane disposed substantially parallel to the lens; and individual pixels being produced by individual ones of the photo-sensitive elements.
 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein: the array of photo-sensitive elements comprises elements operable to respond to a first wavelength and a second wavelength of electromagnetic energy; the elements operable for the first wavelength are configured to respond to a first object representation disposed at a first distance from the lens; and the elements operable for the second wavelength are configured to respond to a second object representation disposed at a second distance from the lens, the second distance being smaller than the first distance.
 11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the image sensor comprises two or more arrays of photo-sensitive elements disposed in first and second plane, the first plane being parallel to the lens, the second plane being oblique to the lens.
 12. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the image sensor comprises an array of photo-sensitive element s disposed in a plane inclined to the lens.
 13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the image sensor comprises an array of photo-sensitive elements disposed in a plane perpendicular to the lens plane.
 14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein: image sensor comprises an array of photo sensitive elements arranged in a plane parallel to the lens; and the image is characterized by an image dimension, the image dimension corresponding to a first resolvable spatial scale; individual pixels of the one or more pixels are characterized by a pixel dimension, the pixel dimension corresponding to a second resolvable spatial scale; and the determination of the image contrast parameter comprises: determination of a two dimensional distribution of energy content within a plurality of groups of pixels of the image, individual ones of the plurality of groups of pixels characterized by a scale of a plurality of spatial scales; partition of the two dimensional distribution into a first portion and a second portion; and evaluation of the first portion two dimensional distribution of energy content.
 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein: the first resolvable spatial scale comprises a largest spatial scale in the image; the first portion comprises an inner portion encompassing the largest spatial scale; the two dimensional distribution of energy content comprises a plurality of components corresponding to individual ones of the plurality of spatial scales; and evaluation of the inner portion comprises a comparison of a first sum of components within the inner portion to a second sum of components within the second portion of the two dimensional distribution.
 16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein: the determination of a two dimensional distribution of energy content is based at least in part on performance of a two dimensional Fourier transform operation on the image; partition of the distribution is configured based on a curve in scale space characterized by a range from the first resolvable spatial scale; and evaluation of the first portion comprises a determination of a ratio of a first sum of components within the first portion to a second sum of components within the second portion of the two dimensional distribution.
 17. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the determination of the image contrast parameter comprises: a determination of a high-pass filtered version of the image configured based on a convolution operation between a kernel and the image, the high passed version comprising a plurality of pixels; and for a given pixel of the plurality of pixels, a determination of a deviation parameter between value of the given pixel and a reference value.
 18. A method of navigating a trajectory by a robotic apparatus comprising a controller, an actuator and a sensor, the method comprising: obtaining at least one image associated with surroundings of the apparatus using the sensor; analyzing the at least one image to determine a contrast parameter of the image; detecting a presence of an object in the at least one image based at least in part on the contrast parameter meeting one or more criteria; and causing the controller to activate the actuator based on the detection of the presence of the object; wherein the actuator activation is configured consistent with a characteristic of the object.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein: the robotic device comprises a vehicle; the object comprises one of a target or an obstacle; and the actuator activation is configured to cause the vehicle to perform at least one of a target approach or obstacle avoidance action.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein: the object characteristic comprises a distance of the camera to the object; for the target approach action the actuator activation is configured to reduce the distance; and for the obstacle avoidance action the actuator activation is configured to increase the distance.
 21. The method of claim 19, wherein: the trajectory is characterized by motion direction; the object characteristic comprises object location with respect to the camera; for the target approach action the actuator activation is configured to adjust the motion towards the location; and for the obstacle avoidance action the actuator activation is configured to adjust the motion away the location.
 22. A method of navigating a robotic apparatus comprising a controller, an actuator and a sensor, the method comprising: obtaining at least one image associated with surroundings of the apparatus using the sensor; analyzing the at least one image to detect a presence of an object in the at least one image; determining that the detected object comprises one of either a target or an obstacle; and causing the controller to selectively activate the actuator based on the determination.
 23. The method of claim 21, wherein the selective activation comprises activation of one or more actions by the actuator which will cause the apparatus to either increase or decrease its proximity to the object. 